The author is playing a game with us
that he really is not very good at, yet.
It's clear that he must be intelligent
in some other language, I bet? But still,
the tricks and defects
he pulls
in irregular ways, as if
on purpose (and maybe
he does?), that he uses
for striking arrays
of effects and conclusions
and questions
do make
for quite an interesting
mistake. At least,
I hope it was.
2 comments:
Five out of five Anazon reviews can't be wrong!
But perhaps they can be tainted by personal motives.
Post a Comment