The Debate: Do Bra And Panty...!?

The Perspective: Let's dive
into ongoing debate about
whether

women
need bras and panties
on. AGAINST: many
women choose to skip
in the world wearing
bras and panties for
various: humidity, rashes,
boils caused by these
dangerous
undergarments? It

is a factor. Some lead women
to avoid them, in countries where
women are not allowed!

To show any part
of body, clothes
cover them entirely. That can
be suffocating, especially hot
and humid in areas. Research

shows almost 95% of women.

It violates privacy and gives many plenty
reason they dislike wearing bra and panty
out and about, despite facial recognition
and butt may place everyone on public
eyewatch, still she feels because it
feels
restricts the freedom with negative
effects on skin,
health and THE ARGUMENT

FOR: on this hand, important! Note
that underwear
serves a purpose! A bra helps
in breastkeeping, firm and uplifts,
supports sagging, prolonged use
of non-bra can lead to breast shape!

Additionally, to avoiding underwear
altogether: it can result in
embarrassing situations:

1. If there is wear and tear in the clothes itself.
Sabotage is real, and people can find right
out in public: the clothes one wears

degrading! Conclusion:

Is embarrassing. Stupid. The debate
continues awful, ongoing with women
expressing their preferences, biased
on personal comfort and prosocial
norms. Result?

The freedom to do without a bra and panty
of any kind! We knew that! Others stress
these undergarments, an importance for
support Breast health maintenance at stake,
and the ultimate claim?

Absolutely, the choice lies with each
individual woman. So stupid we knew
that. Some debate! Please chime in with
"stupid"
or

we knew that