trying to discern their ittiness.
Was personality a personal itty?
Or the -ality of a person? I guess
it may seem to you a bit picky
to care.
But it seems to me
the difference
is stark,
staring,
abject
But it seems to me
the difference
is stark,
staring,
abject
huge.
If one's person
truly has -ality,
- this could be discovered,
determined! It would be detectable!
truly has -ality,
- this could be discovered,
determined! It would be detectable!
Something could be known
about it.
Whereas, if it's just
the ittiness
of being personal, well.
We all have that. All unique,
nothing special
about it.
So I perused and pursued the point
'til some quarry had been cornered
and turned, and partly abused, and
ultimately it was "dorsiventrality"
that provided the clue. "Back-bellyness,"
the quality of having distinct surfaces
corresponding to backbehind and
underfront: as of a leaf! Or of you
I started
to think of your backbelliness,
and I'm abashed to admit
I forgot all about your personality.
I think we'd better face the fact:
whatever personality is,
dorsiventrality is a
part
or two
of it.
about it.
Whereas, if it's just
the ittiness
of being personal, well.
We all have that. All unique,
nothing special
about it.
So I perused and pursued the point
'til some quarry had been cornered
and turned, and partly abused, and
ultimately it was "dorsiventrality"
that provided the clue. "Back-bellyness,"
the quality of having distinct surfaces
corresponding to backbehind and
underfront: as of a leaf! Or of you
I started
to think of your backbelliness,
and I'm abashed to admit
I forgot all about your personality.
I think we'd better face the fact:
whatever personality is,
dorsiventrality is a
part
or two
of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment