A Pocketful of Poesy was and is again a Poem-a-Day(-on-Average) Blog! For 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and now for 2017 and going forward, you may expect to see 365 poems every year, 366 for leap years.

but aren't they all random?

Thursday, March 31, 2022

I, burlap.

I am burlap. 
Heavy, coarse and strong.
Uncomfortable to look at
long. You picture yourself
wearing me, and you're
more into silks, you see.
Or cotton, soft and breathable.
Or even wool, for big warm
coats! 

But I 
am burlap underwear. 
And nothing else! 
I see
you are 
a bit intrigued, 
a bit repulsed. 

You must be wondering how
I'd feel, with inner 
fascination cringe?

Oh, anyway 
I have my hopes. 

Wednesday, March 30, 2022

unbecoming

When someone slips a notch or two 
From everything to nothing new 
When presence fills with keening lack 
More drifting off than coming back 
When someone knew you like yourself,
it's like you've lost yourself as well. 
Important parts you'd given them 
That none can mend or break or tell,
except this once-surprising one. 

Since only they saw that in there.
Caught that angle, wove that light, 
saw the music, had to share.

Such things are
always all surprise.
From catch, to keep,
to wise unfurl.

You'd think
you'd be surprised to reach 
the ends of it! In fraying whirl,
in settling and trickle out to drabs
and drips, but
no. Not so.
It's still the fact
of it at all 

that fills me with surprise,
you know. 

Tuesday, March 29, 2022

repeat customer

Your expiration is
about to end, at which point
you renew. Automatically.  
You will be on our plan again if you do. 
Please check the conditions and terms.
You'll see. They have somewhat changed,
as you might well guess. Yet our service
and rates remain the best. And
you're coming back in! Now
to see

for yourself. 

Press one for okay. 
Press two for help. 

Sunday, March 27, 2022

want better

We make ourselves food 
then we have to eat it
even though it's no good. 
We make ourselves love 
then we have to love it
even though it's no good. 

Why can't we learn
to make it good?
How hard can it be 
to make good food? 

Good love's easier 
than making bad 
it has to be
it has to be.
But we make ourselves 
what we make ourselves,
either everyday,
or eventually. 

We make ourselves this 
'til it's all we have,
and it has to be. 

Saturday, March 26, 2022

Come see

Come see what you can do to me
Come see what I can do to you 
Come see what we can do to us 

I'll be the me if you be you
or you could be the me all day 
and all night too, first-personally 
I don't mind getting us mixed up 
We'll straighten out eventually

to you, we, us, me,
all the way home 


chesswise

A ply is half
a move in chess. 
A trade takes two 
plies - one move, 
yes. To ply one's 
trade means sacrifice 
- unless you nip,
and they don't bite!
But if so, check six 
moves ahead! They 
probably saw some
move instead, and if
you missed it, you'll
get pawn'd.
Or rook'd,
or queen'd
or dead, 
or trodden
on. 

pout off

you absolutely the cutiest pie
you look so absocute I already die 
it's like I go to heaven and got kicked out 
because you look a me and give me some pout 
I beg of you hey no pout look please 
you said it's my pout not yours you tease
I said you pouted first you said no did not 
so I said OK three two one now 

stop! 

so we did 
team work

no pout in team


Thursday, March 24, 2022

Ant vs. Bee

Ant vs. Bee
in a winner take all. 
Ant lost the fight 
- ant ran down a hole. 
Scored as a forfeit. Bee
last seen - making a beeline
back to the queen! That's 
out of bounds!

If ant stood 
strong, he
could hav
e won by
forf
eit. What
a sad song. 
 

Live all our lives this
way, 
humanity! Let life
be a fight you miss on the way by,
in a race to wherever you had to b
e! 
You were going that way
anyway, huh?
Sigh.

Partial survey of inclusion modes

Hm. "Integrate"
to me has a ring
of nonliving elements. Used
of the living,
it feels clinical and
mechanistic. I'd agree

"assimilate" is an undesirable whiff,
though. Seems sinister to me
as a goal for humans incoming. It means
essentially become
as or unto
like or similar.
"Integrate" never alters
the element's essence at least!

The integrated
part
is itself whole!

But only a part, though. 

Of a greater whole, like 
a cog having fits issues, 
maybe. Not wholly 
everybody's kind of party, 
integration. 

"Include" is cool!
I mean, it's almost
too neutral. Says nothing
of fit, compatibility, congeniality,
alignment or common bond,
just "...here! Included!"

Present!

"We drew the
same line around
you as us."
"What
has the drawn
line done though?
Does it signify?
Are we like?
Are we parts
of a bigger snick-click
fit machine?"

"No! No, just
a fulsome, mutual
toleration of presences

here!" 

"EXCELLENT," seethes
the merely included one. "I am MY OWN,
then - and FREE to pursue own good and gain!"
This stinks like self, so..."...yet out of gratitude
for my includers, I include their gain, too,
as good - where it violates NOT MY OWN." 

Risky, perilous business
mere inclusion. It lacks
checks. Controls. 

Inclusion of the human element 
is always perilous. Risk of 
indignation. 'Butt-hurt.' Self 
feels voided and annoyed by
some overriding context meant
as desirable, to assimilate you 
completely - or integrate you 
in a coherence not merely 
or really or nearly your own. Best, 
some

find, 

might be just
to declare inclusion,
and let it be 

the unspecified kind! A deep 
reconciliation or high end 
alignment can develop naturally!
An outpouring and flowing 
to confluence of individual 
purposes, all present! Without
hints, shoves, forced compliance,
disapproval or other guidance, or if not,
the included part can fuck off!
Go be apart! "Disinclude, then! You

were never
really one
of us" 

...we just tolerated your
presence, essence and unique
nature or character - and/or THIS
is the gratitude by which you reject
us for nothing, fine! Then
GO

go. 

Perilous going, though. 
Maybe stay awhile,
figure this out. The others 
seem to like it

that's how they get you
 
by a mysterious liking 
of it.
What the hell

are these people for?

No knowing 
no telling either - pisses 
them off, telling that. Just 
a hapless, default solidarity 
of mutual alienation and
a reciprocity of ignorance, 
overcome by degrees 
in a common and agreed 
purposeful avoidance 
of individual purposelessness.
That's cool! That's what
we all need, probably but 

it matters a lot 
who we get it with.
How they get us. How
we get each other. We are

all quite like 
an assimilar kind 
in this specific integration 
point, we find. 

Inclusion's the real key. 
Exclusion doesn't do it no
not at all. Inclusion
does it. Therefore 

anyone who tries 
to come 'round up 
in here assimilating 
or integrating must be 
rejected! That will learn 
them the lesson, asshole! Include!

Not yourself! Inclusion is something
we must do TO you - it's no unilateral
self-injection move! No, we

include


you,
or not at all.
That's why it means
so much, arguably. 
Potentially

so arguably

Further in a serious of cautionary threats, starting "Anyone who Fs"

"Anyone who Fs with meeeee gets
SPREAD like butter on BREAD
that's popped in a TOASTER ruining
the toaster DEAD" 

try again 

"Anyone who Fs with meeeee gets
SPREAD like butter on BREAD
that's popped FROM a toaster
making it toast INSTEAD, 

perhaps "then eaten in BED?" no
that makes 'Fs with' risk
coming off like 'SEXED with,'
decidedly NOT the arrangement
to necessitate a series of cautionary
THREATS with

next, with 

"Anyone who Fs with meeee gets 
CONFUSED by one
in a series of cautionary THRATS
that I've come
up with previous-LY! Then
delivered post-coitally - wait
in the 'Fs with' metaphor ONLY,
see? - admittedly diminishing
the cautionary ASPECT, some-what.
Making the THREAT inescapable!

THAT'S what you get
when you F's with meeee!

In the non-coital sense, let us both agree
(and it goes without saying, consensually!) 
(though vigorous UN!-ambiguous VERBAL
consent is the hottest unmistakably!) BUT
that's what you get! In the other context!
A hard-to-understand, unfairly belated
inescapably vain postcautionary threat!
Which has failed its ostensible purpose
to deter! Since delivered after I was
already F'D!"

"...With." 

Man.
I need to work
on more of these. Gotta
stockpile if you want credible 
deterrent. Otherwise word gets
'round. "Oh,
don't mess with that dude
his belated threats are just what
you don't want to have to deal with
figuring out. All metaphor, and
inapplicable usually. Best just
not to mess." 

RIGHT. And by 'MESS' they mean
what I mean by 'Fs with!' So,
works out. Point gets
across. 

bam 

Wednesday, March 23, 2022

life don't work there

you're boring as shit
and I'm sick of your blat
and pule.
Talking on 
about daily this
/that

that
you
can't 
liven
up now
to save
your life.
What happened
to you?

Did you 

rife 

strife 

...

bife cife dife fife 

you forget how to fife?
KNIFE! ahh dang no 
relevance. Strong word 
no place to stick it, story 
of my knife 

Yeah OK fair point maybe I'm not
so
hot 
either but 
it's too late
to go back now 
and change your life 
to something with a better 
rhyme for it. You get the 

pointy part.  

one name

Jon walked in 
nervous as hell 
he knew he has a name
and he knew it so well
he knew no one else 
had a name at all 
it kind of pissed him off 
but you couldn't tell 

because he couldn't say 

because his mama told
him the secret that day:

Your name is your very own 
and nobody else has one 
Your name is your very own 
and nobody else has one 

Jon saw a girl
he was intimate with 
their eyes lit up
when they thought of it 
He didn't know her name
and he wished he could 
She didn't even know
what a name was good
for 
but
you couldn't tell 

because Jon was the only one 
with a name, 
and he didn't say 

he thought it'd be too much
to explain how his mama said:   

Your name is your very own
and nobody else has one
Your name is your very own
and nobody else has one

Well history class was a pain in school 
'cause nobody's name goes down in that 
which makes reputations seem pointless, too
As for legacies, what the hell are those?

We can't tell apart our designer clothes 
or argue which cola is best, except
by a long-drawn description of flavor notes 
- which is arguable and subjective at best 

Jon's name is his very own
and nobody else has one 
Jon's name is his very own 
and nobody else has one

Jon wonders if he could
become famous if he could
explain where names come
from

and what they'd be so much good 
for, too. 

Jon knows it would be easier
if we had some.
But how do you explain a thing
like that? When society lacks
the frame?

Jon is a thing of someone's
which nobody has at all 

Jon is a made-up thing 
that would be unrelatable

Vain what way?

It's like trying to measure
a tornado
with a ruler. 
You're going to get
somewhere fast, no
doubt. But nowhere straight
or definitive. You might
as well have taken your
penis out - measure

that way!

As you do the world. How many 
units going around does it go?
Can you ever get there

definitively? 

I call it vain both ways, 
you know. Fruitless and
bootless, pointless and 
useless. Pompous, conceited 
overweening with juices
and confidence blown 
beyond all proportion. 

Immeasurable, 
due to total degrees 
of distortion. 
The first vain 
is a stupid one, but
the last is a fool. A tool
on the run to drive nothing,
pound nothing, join jack, fix
nil. 
 
It's a bad look
but you know you
can pull it off still. 

sunshine down

Who's gonna let the sun 
shine down? Who's gonna 
let the sunshine down? 

Is it you, mister cloud? 
Were you in the way 
when the sunshine down?
I'm gonna kill you 

Is it you, mister world?
Did you turn away 
when the sunshine down?
I'm gonna kill you 

Nobody better stop the sunshine down 
Everybody let the sunshine down!

When the sunshine down 
Get out of the way
let the sunshine down 
or I'm gonna kill you  

Who's gonna let
the sunshine down?
Everybody let the
sunshine down!

Was it you, mister house? 
Did you block it out 
when the sunshine down?
I'm gonna burn you 

Was it you, mister stars?
Did you crowd it out 
when the sunshine down?
I'm gonna - whatever 

Why you gotta bring
the sunshine down? 
Who are you to stop
the sunshine down? 

Was it you? 

Was it you? 

Don't turn away from me, 
I been asking if you
let the sunshine down

Public humiliation by means

Public humiliation by means 
of nudity. 

I think these means
need to be rethought. First,
they're mean. If it be just
barely noble to see such ends 
bared, still, how do you justify  
that? Second, the logic is ass.
 
How is extreme immodesty 
supposed to make us humble? 

The world knows the nude 
are brash, arrogant showoffs. 
Is that the ploy? "Strip them 
nude. Right out in public, as 
a ploy! They will die in shame
not literally though - we need 
their living shame to achieve 
this goal: total humility. WHAT?"

That's too obvious a ploy 
to be pulled off. Shame. 
Let alone the clothes,
which aren't yours. That's 
stealing. Let alone
the touching!
That's assault!

Let it alone, please
let them be. Their lack of 
humiliation is truly theirs, 
their problem. Not one's 
own. Let it alone,

maybe. 

Work on solutions within 
for why the want and need 
in you for others to be humble
is so great and hot. Admit it:
you perv. You project and 
overcompensate for your
own clothes! You are
the unhumble one, 
and you want others
 
to pay a steep price 
in immodesty for
your own attire, 
while you watch! 

Buddy, you are
no buddy to these
people trying to
coax humility forth
by such ass backwards,
cocked out, tits up, pussy 
ass means. It's
mean. 

If their vain,
arrogant modesty
affronts you so, takes
you aback, makes you
want them stripped 
of whatever dignity
you imagine their
prude crutch clothes
impart, you are looking 

in the wrong place for
other people's humility. 
Try the heart. Maybe
find some there in
your own. Then maybe
the mind will stop swelling
its shameful and lascivious
course, 

and grow a pair
of virtues, boss: 
humility, and 
modesty.

Sweet!
One knows its size 
and place in the grand cosmic
scheme! The other is ashamed,
humiliated at the very idea
of being thought a show-off. Isn't
that right? Don't strip modesty
and humility of dignity 
in a vain, arrogant ploy
to humiliate those
who just want
not to be
thought immodest,
parading nude
for other's yuks, 
yucks, jollies and titillations.

It's cruel, pretty rude 
and frankly small of you. 
You can't make others small, 
sweet and humble by turning them 
into public displays, prancing and parading 
conveniently nude. For you to approve
of that's unnatural! It's only human!

Plus they might like it. Backfire.

Proud and sure in their own skin, saying 
"Not so bad, right?" Oh my God
you nude, pompous ego freak! 
Shameless and for real in your 
own skin! Now what have you 
done! They're less humble than 
ever!
You, 

fool,

were looking for humility 
in all the wrong place:
the surface.

True humility 

goes deeper than skin 
and sits within, with 
justice, mercy, compassion 
and a little virtue I like to call 
forbearance: the restraint of one's 
justified wrath! Against clothes, 
perhaps? Well, 

that sounds like a personal problem
if so. 
Rethink
it please. Public
humiliation 
by means of nudity

is the very wrongest means
you could pull off, and wanting it 
so bad you strain against your own 
clothes is a tipoff: you're the perv sir, 
not the prim and modest individuals 
taunting you by going about clothed!

It's a bad look, 
and a pretty 
dirty trick

to try to induce humility
by means of theft, assault
and immodesty. It just
won't work, will it? 
What were you thinking 

no beautiful thought,
I assure you leads
so scandalously 
to entice mind's eye. 
Fantasize about compassion 
instead. Justice. True virtue.

Mercy. Now that's hot 

Tuesday, March 22, 2022

metaphysical claptrap #2

To catch and trap
a spirit. Garden-variety,
outer dark, or special -
First take a box 
make it metal 
not tin 
nor steel 
nor iron 
nor aluminum, 
but any other metal 
works well. Hinged lid 
and a solid construction 
air-tight (no smell). Set 
it on a table, one pillar 
fanning down and out into
three clawed legs, with a circular 
top - otherwise, any table 
will do. Precisely 
three feet high, 
and not one metal 
nail or screw, nor 
any varnish 
you're not 100% sure 
the chemical composition of. 

The rug beneath is immaterial. 
You can get these in any shop. 
They all stock immaterial rugs, 
but 
you'll probably have to shoplift. 
They won't ring you up, it's ok 
it's a little evil and makes 
a spiritual prelude for such 
rituals. Nice. 

All ready, at the appointed hour 
(up to you), simply flip the lid 
open and back, darken the room 
and light the candles (use drapes 
if it's morning) (to darken the room! 
Do not light the candles using drapes) 
all in one smooth motion, and await 
patiently (but in no saintly mindframe)
with an open mind,
believing totally 

a spirit 

will enter the room

believe it 
absolutely

with an open mind.
If you can do it, 
it'll happen.
Only that way

will it happen

- if you cannot attain
to absolute belief, or 
cannot do so while
keeping an open mind, 

no spirit wants to humor that shit!
It's weaksauce is what it is - if
no spirit shows (well, invisibly
shows) that's 
your fault
and a fault in your faith 
capacity, as well as
(obviously) your 
open-mindedness.

So if you don't want 
to know this about yourself,
don't you dare, coward! 

But if you've got the goods in you, 
and you're interested 
to catch and trap a spirit 
(let's confess - pretty mean 
trick!) 

DO IT 

Just wait. If 
when the spirit
enters the room 

(and if it's garden
variety you're after, 
best do the ceremony
in a room 
with a garden-facing
window and no drapes!)

Clap! 

That's it. Just that! 

Clap, and the startled spirit, 
seeing the table and all, will flee 
into the box! For safety, and the lid 
will snap shut of its own cause, 

seemingly. 

That's how you know
a spirit's in it, since
they're invisible. If 
the lid doesn't snap
shut, buddy you just

clapped like an asshole over nothing 

Nice try.

Open your mind some
more, maybe. 
 
Why not is why.  

metaphysical claptrap #1

Who knows how the spirits work? 
It's possible they work without limits 

Slaving away unphysically 
by any means you care 
to explain, 

they can do it 
you see

because spiritually 
is like mentally: it 
is

unphysically bound. 

For real. It is so. For when
have we ever seen a spirit 
physically bound? No
physics or forces or matter

or charge 

can put obstacle in, 
where a spirit's at large. 

Yet responsive they are! 
To emotion and thought 
- they're attracted to these, 
and so sometimes caught 

I believe it's the hidden 
affinity 
between mental and spiritual 
which they
more clearly than we
can see.
It enables the spirits 

to notice, react 
to anguish, desire, 
fear and pain 
- strong pull, clear call 
even though they're not really
in your brain at all.

It is six of one 
and nonetheless:
because the spirits 
are like
imagination 

I guess - in limitlessness,
if in nothing else. In lack
of hard bounds to block 

oneself, such as physical beings
like we
find 'round. In every shape 
and size you could want. 

This link of unlimitedness
(mind for us, spirit for them)
is the kink that fascinates.
They can't quite believe
we believe
that sh!t,

so 

of course they spring 
to prove how great
and limitless, responsive, 
if not
exactly responsible they 
can be. Pretty much doing anything 

(except
affect 
the world you see) 

they can function, move about 
and operate invisibly  

any spiritual way we conceive,
or care to explain. They are
as limitless in being and action 
(provided ineffectual) 
as we are in brain. Conception and fancy, 
immaterially - that aspect of ours
and their entirety
works almost precisely the same.

It really is remarkable 
- and suggestive. Perhaps, 

the mind is infinite, 
and we are all spirits? 

Let us not get 
too far ahead
of ourselves

on that. 

There's a very long way 
to go - a limitless way - 
in understanding spirit 

before we can truly 
conclusively say. 

Besides 
nobody wants to hear it. 

poetry's unrelated offense

You linked 
me a link.
It was definitely
you. 
Not a hijacked
account
spam ops false share. It was you 

and I clicked. In trust. And
it
was
a
poem. 
Which

I think you wrote

and I read, assuming as much but 
it was nothing about me, or us, or
anything we'd discussed, or nature, 
or art, or science, 

or sex. It was 

totally unrelated 

and unpleasant! It made
an uncomfortable, awkward 
effect wriggle and relax
inside, in a minor disgusting
way - not innate. The poem

itself? OK. If I'd found it

without your help, I'd have loved it
at least a bit. But 

because I could not tell what
you wanted at all,
for me to take,
the whole thing 
reeled. Stringless and taut 
in awkward feel. Loose, 

no, loosed - no.

Just loose.

I am a fish unmoored,
in your poem sea. Unyanked, 

unswung by line
or hook, there was no opportunity
to wriggle free, no choice to surrender
inevitably, I was so

uncaught 

in the moment. I swam and 

swum 

and I wish 
- not quite that you'd linked someone 
else - not quite 

but I wish you had not linked me. Or 
as if you must, I suppose - I wish 

you had not left me quite 
so free. 

Also the rhyme scheme 
was incoherent 
kinda 

conspiral gyre

I discovered
who is covering it up?
Don't you think I

need
whistleblower protection? 

If I
am
the victim, 
then I am

harassed by people
who deny me protection
like that. I need
maybe
you have additional info I
missed?
Please 

if your story is like 
mine, get it right
- I will not be derailed 
by nonsense in accuracy. 
If you
really have lived 
this experience,

let's unite!

Trying to prove 
who owes us this. I believe
it must be my persecutors.
Sorry - ours. But in cases
not provably criminal, who
is above them? Who sets 
the stage, works the strings? 
Who controls the charge, and

how can they be exposed? 
Short of the difficulty of 
proving a negative - which
everybody knows? 

To make them take 
action to make me
sure.
Us sure. Secure
and safe in convictions, 
I stand harassed and endangered 
on every side

but mine 

is at least
undivided
on this 
at last

with you 
in this selfsame
fix. So

you say 
you are,
so I say 
I believe 

in this. But
do I believe you?
Or in you? Or just 
a mix? 

I don't know yet 
it's bliss

so let's bet 
and see.

Yoga pants on men!

Yoga pants on men. OK!
Just like Speedos, except 
more

I see no predicament.
Comfy, stretchy, if not
too obscure, but -
tight-ass dungarees?
Taut hard cotton slacks,
snug fit? Please, 

my eyes cannot quite breathe! 
How'd you get yourself in it? 

Somehow, women seem (this is
mysterious, in hows and whys) 
to pull it off quite effortless. I guess

They're simply more clothes-wise. 

countlessness

I've lost count 
of how many times I forgot 
to ask you to remind me of
all we've got, 
but you 
do it anyway,
effortlessly -
I don't
think you ever even try 
or agree, or know 
that you're doing it. 
Whether or not - 
you sure do remind me
to ask you
how many times 
I forgot? 

I couldn't say 
though 'cause I
lost count  

That slip 
is a blank check
testament 

to the amount 

Monday, March 21, 2022

What "it" is

Can I put it inside you? 
If "it" is my heart? 
Will you ride it all slippery 
slick and bold, rolling your hips 
and arching your back? 
Now 
what if "it"
isn't my heart?  
Would you scold? 

Sunday, March 20, 2022

flighting the premise

  1. A wonderbolt held its peace, 
  2. poised in the sky, awaiting 
  3. hypothetical catch release fly
  4.  

Leave That Like That

Ooo. 
Did you even look? 
Look at what you did there 
Did you even think? 
How should things be middling fair?
Did you even say? 
"That's the way we take care!"

I see what you did, there 
I can't even 
can't even 

The idea that you'd leave that like that 
The idea that you'd leave that like that 

The idea that you'd leave that like that 
gets you a smack! Let's 

leave that like that 

cat react

When people see a cat 
like this on Instagram,
which is an anagram for "ramtag sin" 
their first instinct is to 
click on something, or 
look awhile, and keep 
scrolling. 

In real life however 
these options are not 
available. Children 
and young people are
increasingly freezing up, 
confronted with kitties 
so adorable 

but unlike their devices 
when they freeze up 
you can't just turn them off 
and on again. Children 
and young people are 
legendarily easy to turn 
off. But to try to turn one 
on takes a pervert of some 
kind so 

Back off
Just be wise and 
wait for the cat 
to go away of its 
own instincts. 

or 

click on it!

she danced panorama

I feel like all this time
these very hills
and peaks were rising
and rolling and heaving
into being, it was just

so you could do that.

The landscape held its breath,
and clapped. 


Saturday, March 19, 2022

worst perfect

I have not done my job if you don't know 
that everything about you uplifts me so
even all the crap that I can't abide 
because it's you doing it I cannot hide
my delight 
when we fight 
it's so much better than
only alright 

when we play 
you play foul 
and I cheer every point 
that you make 
that I can't allow 

You're perfect in the worst way 
You're perfect in the worst way 
Some parts of you so very far from okay 
are the single best parts of my night,
my day, 
my life 

My love.
You can be the death of me
any time you choose, because you've
been the life.
Fair is fair, give and taketh away
as you like. Just shove
it. 
Where it goes.
And whatever it is 
up the place you chose, 
push it. 
You pull me.
When you rub the wrong way
I'm in ecstasy!

You're perfect in the worst way 
You're perfect in the worst way 
Some parts of you so very far from okay 
are just what I think, when I think of you
and I say 

You're perfect in the worst way 
You're perfect in the worst way 
Some parts of you so very far from allowed
parts in anyone else I would just walk out
but in you they complete some miraculous whole
and I love you so much, just where 
you go 
where you never should go 
where nobody should go 
but you go, 
there you go.

my geekery

I wish you were a geek about 

more of the things I am a geek about 

even though 

you would expose me as a
half
ass
geek
on what I love most
a half
ass
geek
I am not even close

to what a geek should be
in these chosen fields
of my geekery 

I wish you were a geek

about these
like me.

But you'd be better than me.
And we
could geek about them endlessly, 

and you

could teach me what a geek about these

should be. 

I guess the fact is
I'm more of a geek
about you

than anything else I find.  

Maybe you
could educate me on what
a geek about you

should be

sometime

Friday, March 18, 2022

one two three four five six seven

I was at that age.
I think every kid is -
in a sense, differently
- but it's still gee whiz.

I could feel every one
in my mind agree. It
happened only once

and endlessly. Since

then, in-the-moment
has stretched to now.
I never get out.
So far,
so then -
I know it will
end. I do not
know how.

It is just my way, so
it seems to tend, so
I tend it so.
It's like gardening.
It takes constancy,
and one hell of a lot
of spring. 

pronouns go so far only

"Who is that ugly-ass bitch 
with the braids?" he said 

but she 

looked right at me. 

"HE said" I repeated. To clarify.
She kept looking at me, though. 

Right in the I. 

audacity to clarify

"Back!"

I yelled low, like a voice
inside. 

"baby got,"
I additionally, gamely
supplied, lamely but
not enough 

for pride. ("Baby got"
was not done to make "back"
lamer, but as if to ensure
she would not think she'd picked up
a lion tamer, stalking her now
from back behind, with a chair 
in hand and no doubt a whip 
somewhere) 

These things must needs 
be said, or they shan't 
be gotten or pointed out! 

See, I'd spied and referred
(by the safe word "back")
to a fair specimen of the same, 
no flaw, no lack - this was, 
that day,
a sort of ideal 
made real in the classic sense:

a back. 

So sleek visually contoured
it made my eyes feel. You know,
"backless dress" is not really
the word for that. It's backful
as hell, way more than most
dresses! This subtly-muscular
dorsally-sweeping expanse 
playing hide and sweep 
with her tresses rose up
from above those two dimples
some have, like dents
like eyes, if the gluteal cleft
were a nose (a drawn line,
picture it) and who knows
what the mouth would be?

The undercuppage of the buttocks? 

I laughed! I couldn't see these 
making a mouth. But oh, what 
a nose though. I would would beep
that nose, I suppose. I suppose 
too much
I might always beep a nose 
too much - enough!
The point! 

It's a back I meant! 
Not to take her aback
from behind, just
a word of assent
to the fact her back
was remarkable. 

And she knew it, or 
had just been informed. 
It was cool! I did really
not have to go on, "clarify." 
For sure.
But I did.
I had flung Mixalot
in the mix to dispel the whole
lion-tamer routine I'd inadvertently
raised from a cub, now risen rampant,
soon to a rampage, bub! 

I had to do something.

"Got back!"

I supplied cheerfully!

Know this. Not one word 
of my clarification 
was lion. All that big
cat stuff was implied
by the chair and the whip 
which I ditched 
just before she turned,
and kindly laughed 
in my face, as usual. It 

was one of our in-jokes. I 

was the setup man. Fed her 
a line, and she punched it. 

I hadn't quite explained yet 
what had just happened out 
loud, though, so:

"In the classic sense of 'back,'"
I lamely gamed. And:

"...And probably in the presumptuously
-familiar (unwarranted) sense of 'baby,'"
(which was duh and no duh in one, by
that point, since she'd already given her
"All's-well,-Whew!" laugh - but it was 
too late by laugh-time, as I'd already thought
to say this, and as it's the thought that counts,
and as further it'd already passed check-stage,
stamped 'go,' I felt it a waste to mount an
appeals process. So I said it!)

(Having also by this point as you note
completely lost any sense or pretense
of incorporating inner monologue
with outer dialogue (hope sprung
foolish, there) as a half-uttered
half-thought rhyme scheme, weaving
an epic narrative poem fit to get caught
up in, perchance). (Bold attempt

as usual, but lost the thread - apparently.)

"...but it was necessary-"

I continued, justifiably needlessly 

"-to complete an allusion to one of a
justly-bygone era's then-popular songs, which
were always of course a bit risqué."

I triumphantly paused.

Then the capper 
(just in case):

"If apology is offensive, I apologize." 

I had been perfecting my hurt look, 
and wow. Still some sweet, sweet
perfecting to do on that one

synchronicity city

Synchronicity City
was Coincidence Burg. But 
before, it was just two towns 
unmixed, unmerged, since
neither populace was aware
both towns had been built
on shared grounds, there. One

was called Fate.

And the other was
called Fate. 

This 

can only partly
explain the long wait. 

sad redacted

The girl with the world 
in her world-wide hands 
met the boy with the skies 
in his star-struck eyes 
and his eyes clouded over 
and her face hid in hands 
since they both saw their fates 
called for too many plans. 

Just kidding. They skipped 
happy-everly forth, straight 
to afterwards, straight to till
death of course, and they did
their part and raised rows
of corn on course to the end.
All their words were born.

And the narrative came.
It was meant to be, since
she meant it and he 
had come to trust
what she meant 
(or she could get
mean, you know?).
They decided to prefer
the pronoun "us." 

Between now when they meet
(cute sad and distrait), and the end
we've decided skipped to (great!), let's say 
came ripping yarn and heartstrings
swelling up to soar upon like 
gilded wings,

a true hum-dinger.
So much good time

to spend. 

But it's now. 
We can't have 
this end. 

conspiracy evangelist

There is an important 
web 
of world widening lines 
drawing
taut together even 
and odd all over lands,
coasting to seas and back
up the other end 
as if 
distance
had been vanquished, banished,
reduced
again
to conceptual. People

People

Strangers, even - strangers
especially largely swept up in this net
of insidious effect and unknown cause,
finding each other rude, rude - why?

Why here? They ask. Why 

are people rude on this site?

People 

are rude onsite, people. It's not
the "site." Get over it, calm
up, grow down and root
in the new nature, which
is - spoiler! Alert! Achtung! 
- a bunch of computers strung
together by lines you can see
- material, bendy, cords essentially -
and beams and waves in the air you can't

see

The beams and waves, I mean. You
can't see
them.
The air
you can see
obviously
these days. It's blue,
and way way up there if 

it's a good day 

Not too much of this damn 
'water vapor' pollution (so called)

which 

is for reals, by the way. We invented it
by calling them
"clouds,"

and acting with alacrity,
foreseeing generations of need, want
and cowed obeisance, establishing gods 

(or in one cheapskate case, a titan!) to hold
them up. It was done differently (culture),
but usually you hold the sky up by the solid blue
dome above all the water vapor pollution or 'clouds'
so-called.

That works for the day.

At night, stars do
the work, apparently. Lil' spikes
driven in bright! To fix it. 

I wonder what it was like before 
they thought of that. Broken, 
I know, but how could they tell? In any case, 
those ancient sages of loresmithery and lore-war
back in their age of the world of lorecraft, 
wow.  

They invented things today's scientists
feel
ashamed of.
How can you compete
with solving the problem of the sky?
Way up there before aeroplanes, with nothing
evidently holding it up, by spiking the night-time
sky with stars and hiring or press-ganging
gods (and one titan) into service all over
the world?

An idea independently arrived-at
just by looking up! These geniuses

solved so many problems science today
can't even see to study. Yet their names 
- Ugh or Grunt, probably in most cases
- no loss - are in most cases lost. See, 

The Storyweaver 

(unlike today) was no superstar power
-mover in the industry. The show was 
the show, not the showmaker. 

We did that.   

It was us who took care of the sky,
for all future generations to look up,
breath relieved sighs (a boon to trees
and vegetation back then - it's not talked
about, but humans have always done
their part for nature!) and rest easy.

We did that. 

We were all geniuses once. So now,
this new threat, in our weakened,
weaksauce, weak-ass diminished
and intellectually-stunted, crippled
state (I do not bemoan or demean 
the stunts modern intellectual cripples 
accomplish - it is all the more to laud, 
given their evident handicaps and
acrobatics), is even worse:

A web of human communication.

Oh yes, it's there. It is real all between
us and around. Hung and strung.
Interlicked, interpoked, interpenetrating 
and (who knows?) invaginating 
us all, for all I know. How 

can we tell? These are deep, 
deep fakes I'm hearing about, 
and in that sense - when you fake it 
deep enough, it gets real 

I've been told. How real?

You can get stalked on it. You can 
get bullied on it. It, the so-called web
("SCW" for short) is a thing in 
and around and very much about 
the world. You can spend time 
on there. Pastime. You can work 
a job on it, or via it. It's sucking 
jobs upline (which is what they 
call it, despite downline would 
be more apropos? This SCW
is bringing us down that line!)

You can die upline.

People have, right in front
of the terminal. That is why
it's called that. They want

you, maybe

to die upline.
Worse, most life
-deranging to some,
you can "meet"

some faraway babe 

and change both your lives
forever no-takebacks by wasting 
years, even decades, finding one or both 
of you waking up old in a different country, 
still together despite the messy and horrendous, 
acrimonious divorce ("we just decided heck, let's
get unmarried!" - he, "turns out we loved it better
the other way," - she

I'm not being bigoted here. Those pronouns 
are accurate to specific case.

"...But we decided to keep the living-on-the 
-same-landmass part," - both. "Same house
even," he piped up cheekily! "When you 
behave," she cheeked, pipe-uppily)

The point is it is changing lives. 

Now. 

Ongoing. 

It's some kind of web. Look out 
I know I said "web" already, but
does that tell you how to spot it? 
"Unseen web. Invisible web." Better.
Watch out! For the web is everywhere
you can't see, and 

growing popular. More
and more people suck 
into it all day. 

Soon

it will be almost
insurmountable to stop.
And despite it is literally
and figuratively everywhere,
nobody's talking about it, and 

why not? Who wants us not to know? 

I just wanted to warn 
you I have checked and dug deep
where hands and eyes should not
go.

No one is talking about it.
Even on any internet site
or even in-person (that's
when - never mind). 

It's a big hush-up.

They don't 
apparently
want you
to know,
but well

too bad 

now you know

distance fusion engine

Distance fusion engine revving 
Getting hotter quicker letting 
fundamental forces quiver 
quake and coalesce to giver,
building up to points unleashing
heart and liver brain frenetic
pressure, heat and energetic
fields encompass, sparks
and flying snaking shaky bolts
undying almost almost to immortal 
hit the switch! Transmit to portal! 

Is it working on your end? 
Am I coming through? 

Just send 

indigestion of celestial origin

I always want to talk
to you when you're asleep. 
Lying like an angel there,
next to me, invisible.  
I wouldn't want to trouble
your angelic dreams. 
And so I swallow
all my words. 

My belly
screams. 

I know the source 
of this complaint, 
and it's not you. 

It's just these nights'
unspoken wishes 
missing you.  


Tuesday, March 15, 2022

object lesson

Punish the object that is misused. Say
"This is why we can't have good things."
Abuse all the users of things themselves
that have by their use been declared unwell, 
consigned to deep wells and garbage dumps -
regardless whose use was well and good! 
Or whose use was ill.

Punish 
the things 
themselves. 

This will show
how we're merciful, 
how wise to judge
no one personally.

Just deprive us all,
deprive equally -
until all the things
we have ruled out sum
to an obstacle of such size
and weight, squeezing out

the life we would never kill. 

Punish the things, not 
the people we hate. 

Friday, March 11, 2022

people have places

People have places
all over their faces, 
all over their fronts -
all over their backs. 
In fact "backs," "fronts"
and "faces" are places! 
But there are so many
more places than that. 

Some places are big, 
with smaller places in!
Some places are tiny, 
but someplace surrounds.
So let's you and me play
Place-Point-Say! It's one
of the easiest games around.

Hey, you go first! Take your finger
and point! Poke gently anyplace
that you like, on me. Or any place
that you don't like - but you have
to touch if you want to see. 

Then I'm up! On the spot
- I will have to name that place.
If I can't? That's a point for your side!
If I can, my turn! I will try
to score a point
in a place upon you
whose name you can't find.

But if it's just a made-up name
you give, no score for me. 
That's what it's called!
It counts! But we have
to remember that place
and the name we found.
That's its name, y'all. 

If it comes up later, 
and you name it wrong
- that's foul on you,
and a point for me. 
Same if I pull that trick!
You see, only the first
made-up name per place
is home free. 

If a place has many real names,
you are always free
to use these 
on you.
But a place with no name
is the point of the game! We've got 
to discover and learn what's new.    

This game is the way
we discover ourselves,
and what all of the names
of our places are. 

Restrictions: if the place named is
"shirt" or "pants" or anything like
- a removable place? That counts! 
But it only counts once, then you have 
to dispense with that place. Removable 
places are stunts.  

For a big place name (like "front")
if the other says "big!" then that name
does count, but is then retired
- you can't use it any more
for that big ol' place. Unless you 
challenge: "No big!" you can say!
Then the big-caller's on the spot!
And they have to point out
three places with names, within
the called-big place. That's a point
for them if they can, and the place
is ruled big, and they keep their turn. 

Otherwise, the whole game could be played
just saying "front!" and "back!" every time.
No fun - and nothing learned.

However, no made-up names
in the big challenge. For only 
the person whose places they are
gets to make that up - though
of course they are free
to use a name the other made-up, 
if they have that same place
on them. In fact, it's considered 
a courtesy. 

The most important thing 
when laying out rules 
is to lose the rhyme scheme 
(if any) as you go. This shows 
"this is no poem, but some serious
rules for a game that matters." 
Poems are kinda kid stuff, all 
sing-song nursery beats and meter. 
Rules are very adult. Serious!  

One last rule. Important: not the eyes.
Well for me, not the eyes. At the start 
of the game,
we can each declare
three places out-of-bounds.
The eyes count as two.  

Monday, March 07, 2022

love epical

If I were the man
And you were the woman 
and people came runnin' 
to save us from ruin, 

because they all had so much
invested in us, 
because we were the reason
they're believin' in love -

Could you take the hit?
Could I suck it up?
For everyone's sake?
Trudge on and adjust?  

Because they all had so much
invested in us?
Despite between us
we'd stopped believing in love?

We must 
I really think we must 
I think we kinda must 
this love is a trust

Thursday, March 03, 2022

Only Option

There is only one option.
It should be a religion. The 1st
& Only Option Holy Church
of Your Decision. The Holy
Option's mandatory. None
may refuse. What happens
if we refuse?

"You get JACK." What if
we don't want jack? "You
get it." Then what if we go
with the option? "Then
you get all the jack 

you want." WE DON"T
WANT JACK!

Oh don't worry. You 
will